Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Haney v. Jones et al
as 5:2010cv00400
Petitioner:
Roger Sloan Haney
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sloan v. McCoy et al
as 5:2010cv00387
Plaintiff:
Steven Douglas Sloan
Defendant:
Genese McCoy, Mary Stebens and James Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brunsilius v. Sloan
as 1:2010cv00739
Petitioner:
Wayne Brunsilius
Respondent:
Brigham Sloan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weatherall v. Sloan et al
as 1:2010cv00336
Petitioner:
Christopher Weatherall
Respondent:
Brigham Sloan and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Sloan, et al
as 10-1014
Petitioner - Appellant:
AARON LEE COLEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIGHAM SLOAN, Warden/Trustee, Bent County Correctional Facility and JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Matheny v. Sloan et al
as 1:2009cv02411
Petitioner:
Jonathan Matheny
Respondent:
Brigham Sloan and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Sloan
as 1:2009cv01192
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lee Coleman
Defendant:
Bringram Sloan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jiron v. State of Colorado, et al
as 09-1118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE M. JIRON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, A. WILLIAM RITTER, JR., individually and in his official capacity as Governor of Colorado, COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Jiron v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2009cv00468
Plaintiff:
Lawrence M. Jiron
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Bill W. Ritter, Jr., Bill (I) W. Ritter, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jiron v. Sloan et al
as 1:2009cv00102
Petitioner:
Lawrence M. Jiron
Respondent:
Brighman Sloan, Bill Ritter and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
