Civil Rights Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01080
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sloan v. United Technologies Corp.
as 14-396
Plaintiff - Appellant: Michael Sloan
Defendant - Appellee: United Technologies Corp., DBA United Technologies Research Center
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4051
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sloan v. Caruso
as 13-3328
Plaintiff: Richard Bozulich and Thomas R. Stevens
Plaintiff - Appellant: Sam Sloan
Defendant - Appellee: Salvataore G. Caruso, Daniel S. Szalkiewicz and Board of Elections in the City of New York
Sloan et al v. Caruso et al
as 1:2013cv06104
Plaintiff: Sam Sloan, Richard Bozulich and Thomas R. Stevens
Defendant: Salvataore G. Caruso, Daniel S. Szalkiewicz and Board of Elections in the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05614
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv04265
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dumont v. Bassett Medical Center
as 12-1805
Plaintiff - Appellant: Daniel W. Dumont
Defendant - Appellee: Bassett Medical Center, & Representatives/Employees, Stephen J. Dehorn, Dr., Craig R. Henson, Dr. and others
Sloan v. United Technologies Corp.
as 3:2012cv00259
Plaintiff: Michael Sloan
Defendant: United Technologies Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-5166
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?