Cases 1 - 10 of 163
Sloane v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65288
Plaintiff:
Neil Sloane
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lewis v. Sloan
as 3:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Bruce Anthony Lewis
Defendant:
Deandre Lamar Sloan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Sloan-Losonsky v. Merkley Midwest - Ohio Toledo I, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01328
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Sloan-Losonsky
Defendant:
Merkley Midwest - Ohio Toledo I, Inc. doing business as Hires Dental Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Sloan v. USA
as 1:2022cv01269
Petitioner:
Dameion Sloan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Allen v. Angel's Care Family Home, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
Jenike Allen
Defendant:
Angel's Care Family Home, Inc., Todd Sloan and Lisa Sloan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sloan v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00969
Petitioner:
Claude Gene Sloan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sloane v. DeWine et al
as 2:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
Alfie Sloane
Defendant:
Mike DeWine, Dave Yost, Paul J. Gains and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jorgensen et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05269
Plaintiff:
Bradley Jorgensen and Sloane Conte
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
