Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Pool v. Woodland Park School District RE-2 et al
as 1:2023cv01947
Plaintiff:
Jessica Pool
Defendant:
Woodland Park School District RE-2, Ken Witt, Ken (I) Witt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guernon et al v. Barroso et al
as 1:2022cv02547
Plaintiff:
Anthony Guernon and Keanha Slocum
Defendant:
Joel Barroso and Stevens Transport Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00540
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hansen v. Utah State University et al
as 1:2018cv00101
Defendant:
Tim Slocum, Jared Schultz, Utah State University and others
Plaintiff:
Toni R. Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirkland v. Drake et al
as 2:2011cv02347
Plaintiff:
Wayland Dee Kirkland
Defendant:
Diane Zadra Drake, Jessica Slocum, Katie Pope and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Slocum v. Corporate Express US Inc., et al
as 11-5083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHERINE R. SLOCUM
Defendant - Appellee:
CORPORATE EXPRESS US INC., CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE PRODUCTS INC., COX COMMUNICATIONS CENTRAL II, INC. and others
Slocum v. Corporate Express US Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00650
Plaintiff:
Katherine R Slocum
Defendant:
Corporate Express US Inc. , Corporate Express Office Products Inc. , Cox Communications Central II, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slocum v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2009cv01310
Plaintiff:
Melissa Slocum
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.