Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Joseph Danihel v. Executive Office of the Presid, et al
as 15-2458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH OSMOND DANIHEL
Defendant - Appellee:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, OFFICE OF UNITED STATES SENATOR OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
DANIHEL v. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT et al
as 2:2014cv06880
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DANIHEL
Defendant:
OFFICE OF PRESIDENT, US HUD, US SENATOR PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Danihel v. President United States of Ame, et al
as 14-4056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH OSMOND DANIHEL
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, OFFICE OF UNITED STATES SENATOR OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
DANIHEL v. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv01330
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH OSMOND DANIHEL
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES SENATOR OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROCKETT v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2011cv07111
Plaintiff:
DAVID CROCKETT
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, PASQUALE T. DEON, SR., JAMES C. SCHWARTZMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CROCKETT V. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, ET AL.
as 2:2011cv04008
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, SEPTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS, SEPTA MANAGERS and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CROCKETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SMYLER & GENTILE et al v. WESTPORT INSURANCE CORPORATION
as 2:2008cv03532
Plaintiff:
SMYLER & GENTILE, DENISE J. SMYLER and CALVIN TAYLOR, JR.
Defendant:
WESTPORT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
