Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Hasselmann v. Snyder
as 4:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
Charles Hasselmann
Respondent:
Kevin Snyder
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Snyder v. Iowa Department of Corrections
as 4:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Ryan D. Snyder
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snyder v. The Zeroll Company et al
as 4:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Karla Darlene Snyder
Defendant:
The Zeroll Company and The Pampered Chef, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal-Employment (Wrongful Termination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00302
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Snyder v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00103
Plaintiff:
Alan L Snyder
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bruno v. Waterloo Police Department et al
as 6:2021cv02012
Plaintiff:
Michelle Lee Bruno
Defendant:
Waterloo Courier, Westbro Baptist Church, Waterloo Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cornice & Rose International, LLC v. Four Keys, LLC et al
as 6:2020cv02097
Defendant:
Brian Young, Young Construction, Ltd, Northern Cedar Service Co, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Cornice & Rose International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Cornice & Rose International, LLC v. Four Keys, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00115
Defendant:
BRIAN YOUNG, YOUNG CONSTRUCTION, LTD, PERRY NOVAK ELECTRIC, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Cornice & Rose International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
