Cases 41 - 50 of 763
INGRAM v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
DE'ANDRE MCKYE INGRAM
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
JOHNSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
KRYSTAL A. JOHNSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
ONEIL v. KIJAKAZI
as 5:2022cv00039
Petitioner:
David Oneil
Respondent:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
SMITH v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EUGENE SMITH
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
ONEIL v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv00951
Plaintiff:
DAVID ONEIL
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
LUKE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv00945
Plaintiff:
SANDRA LUKE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
SMITH v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv00899
Plaintiff:
SHEILA SMITH
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
GUESSFORD v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv00879
Plaintiff:
TONYA ELIZABETH GUESSFORD
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Pierce v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00338
Plaintiff:
Valerie Pierce
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
WILDS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv00827
Plaintiff:
WILLA WILDS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
