Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Dickson v. Janvey
as 23-10726
Appellant:
Hugh Dickson and Mark McDonald
Appellee:
Ralph S. Janvey, in his capacity as the Court-appointed Receiver for the Stanford Receivership Estate, Official Stanford Investors Committee and Societe Generale Private Banking (Suisse) S.A.
Stanford v. Janvey
as 23-10689
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert Allen Stanford
Appellee:
Ralph S. Janvey, in his capacity as the Court-appointed Receiver for the Stanford Receivership Estate, Official Stanford Investors Committee, Societe Generale Private Banking (Suisse) S.A. and others
In re: Toronto-Dominion Bank
as 23-20033
Petitioner:
In re: Toronto-Dominion Bank, Independent Bank, formerly known as Bank of Houston and HSBC Bank, P.L.C.
Respondent:
Guthrie Abbott, Steven Queyrouze, Sarah Elson-Rogers and others
In re: Toronto-Dominion Bank
as 22-20648
Petitioner:
In re: Toronto-Dominion Bank
Respondent:
Guthrie Abbott, Steven Queyrouze, Sarah Elson-Rogers and others
Rotstain et al v. Trustmark National Bank et al
as 4:2022cv09000
Defendant:
Independent Bank, Trustmark National Bank, The Toronto-Dominion Bank and others
Petitioner:
Bonnie O Habel, Daniel Gomez Ferreiro, Annalisa Mendez and others
Plaintiff:
Peggy Roif Rotstain, Guthrie Abbott, Catherine Burnell and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Official Stanford Investors Committee, Samuel Troice, Punga Punga Financial Limited and others
Interested Party:
John J Little
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Rotstain et al v. Trustmark National Bank et al
as 4:2022cv00800
Defendant:
Independent Bank, Trustmark National Bank, The Toronto-Dominion Bank and others
Petitioner:
Bonnie O Habel, Daniel Gomez Ferreiro, Annalisa Mendez and others
Plaintiff:
Peggy Roif Rotstain, Guthrie Abbott, Catherine Burnell and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Official Stanford Investors Committee, Samuel Troice, Punga Punga Financial Limited and others
Interested Party:
John J Little
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Peggy Rotstain, et al v. Trustmark National Bank, et al
as 19-11131
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARLOS BARBIERI, JANA L. AMYX, DORRIS BURCHETT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK, TORONTO-DOMINION BANK, BLAISE FRIEDLI and others
Not Yet Classified:
OFFICIAL STANFORD INVESTORS COMMITTEE
Peggy Rotstain, et al v. Trustmark National Bank, et al
as 17-90038
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
GUTHRIE ABBOTT, STEVEN QUEYROUZE, SARAH ELSON-ROGERS and others
Intervenor Plaintiff - Respondent:
OFFICIAL STANFORD INVESTORS COMMITTEE, SAMUEL TROICE, PUNGA PUNGA FINANCIAL, LIMITED and others
Defendant - Respondent:
TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK, TORONTO-DOMINION BANK, SG PRIVATE BANKING (SUISSE) S.A. and others
Intervenor Defendant - Respondent:
BLAISE FRIEDLI
Respondent:
JOHN J. LITTLE, Court Appointed Examiner and RALPH S. JANVEY
In Re: Irving H. Picard, Trust
as 17-2992
Appellee:
Six Sis AG, LGT Bank (Switzerland) LTD., as successor in interest to Dresdner Bank (Schweiz) AG, Unifortune Conservative Fund and others
Amicus Curiae:
Alvin Gindel, Neil Reger, individually and in his capacity as trustee of the Neil Reger Profit Sharing Keogh, Brian Child and others
Petitioner:
Ralf Michaels, Professors of Conflict of Laws, William S. Dodge, Professors of Conflict of Laws, Hannah L. Buxbaum, Professors of Conflict of Laws and others
Intervenor:
Securities Investor Protection Corporation
Appellant:
Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Substantively Consolidated SIPA Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC and Bernard L. Madoff
In Re: Irving H. Picard, Trust
as 17-3047
Appellant:
Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Appellee:
Societe Generale Private Banking (Suisse) S.A., FKA SG Private Banking Suisse S.A., Societe Generale Private Banking (Lugano-Svizzera) S.A., FKA SG Private Banking (Lugano-Svizzera) S.A., Socgen Nominees (UK) Limited and others
Intervenor:
Securities Investor Protection Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
