Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv04593
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
State of South Carolina et al v. Haaland et al
as 2:2023cv03651
Plaintiff: State of South Carolina and South Carolina Department of Administration
Defendant: Deb Haaland, United States Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv03060
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bishop of Charleston v. Marcia Adams
as 22-1175
Plaintiff / Appellant: BISHOP OF CHARLESTON, d/b/a Roman Catholic Diocese of Charleston, a Corporation Sole and SOUTH CAROLINA INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: MARCIA ADAMS, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the South Carolina Department of Administration, BRIAN GAINES, in his official capacity as budget director for the South Carolina Department of Administration and HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of South Carolina
Intervenor Defendant: ORANGEBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT and SOUTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Clarence Jenkins, Jr. v. South Carolina Department of Employment Workforce We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-2177
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLARENCE B. JENKINS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee: SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT WORKFORCE, SOUTH CAROLINA HUMAN AFFAIRS COMMISSION, SOUTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL and others
Bishop of Charleston v. Orangeburg County
as 21-1912
Plaintiff / Appellee: BISHOP OF CHARLESTON, d/b/a Roman Catholic Diocese of Charleston, a Corporation Sole and SOUTH CAROLINA INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: HENRY MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of South Carolina, MARCIA ADAMS, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the South Carolina Department of Administration, BRIAN GAINES, in his official capacity as budget director for the South Carolina Department of Administration and others
Intervenor Defendant: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: ORANGEBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT and SOUTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
as 21-1759
Plaintiff / Appellee: DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant: CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Intervenor: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EX REL ALAN WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
Defenders of Wildlife v. State of South Carolina
as 21-1708
Plaintiff / Appellee: DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Intervenor Defendant: CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EX REL ALAN WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01606
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Defenders of Wildlife v. Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
as 21-1589
Plaintiff / Appellee: DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EX REL ALAN WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?