Cases 11 - 18 of 18
State of Alaska v. Department of Agriculture, et al
as 13-5150
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State of Alaska
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alaska Electric Light & Power, Alaska Power & Telephone, Alaska Miners Association and others
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee:
Southeast Alaska Power Agency
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Agriculture, Thomas J. Vilsack, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture, Thomas L. Tidwell, in his official capacity as Chief, Forest Service and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Alaska Center for the Environment, Boat Company and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
Alaska Forest Association and Southeast Conference
State of Alaska v. Department of Agriculture, et al
as 13-5147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
State of Alaska
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee:
Alaska Electric Light & Power, Alaska Power & Telephone, Alaska Miners Association and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Agriculture, Thomas J. Vilsack, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture, Thomas L. Tidwell, in his official capacity as Chief, Forest Service and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Alaska Center for the Environment, Boat Company and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
Alaska Forest Association and Southeast Conference
Organized Village of Kake, et al v. AGRI, et al
as 11-35517
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE, THE BOAT COMPANY, ALASKA WILDERNESS RECREATION AND TOURISM ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, TOM VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture and others
Intervenor-Defendant:
ALASKA FOREST ASSOCIATION, INC.
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF ALASKA
Moussaoui et al v. Hugh M Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Company Inc 556 US129 S. Ct2252 173 L. Ed. 2d 1208, 2009 et al
as 3:2010cv00249
Plaintiff:
Zacarias Moussaoui and Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Hugh M Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Company Inc 556 US129 S. Ct2252 173 L. Ed. 2d 1208, 2009, Frank Ricci, John Destefano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Organized Village of Kake et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 1:2009cv00023
Plaintiff:
Organized Village of Kake, Organized Village of Kake, The Boat Company and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, United States Forest Service, Tom Vilsack and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
SEACC, et al v. Federal Highway Administration, et al
as 09-35555
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION COUNCIL, SKAGWAY MARINE ACCESS COMMISSION, LYNN CANAL CONSERVATION, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RAY LAHOOD, in his official capacity as Secretary of Transportation and others
Defendant-intervenor:
STATE OF ALASKA
SEACC, et al v. State of Alaska, et al
as 09-35551
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION COUNCIL, SKAGWAY MARINE ACCESS COMMISSION, LYNN CANAL CONSERVATION, INC. and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RAY LAHOOD, in his official capacity as Secretary of Transportation and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant:
STATE OF ALASKA
Southeast Alaska, et al v. USACE, et al
as 06-35679
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION COUNCIL, SIERRA CLUB and LYNN CANAL CONSERVATION
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, TIMOTHY J. GALLAGHER, Colonel, in his official capacity as District Engineer, LARRY L. REEDER, in his official capacity of Chief of the Regulatory Branch and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
COEUR ALASKA, INC., GOLDBELT, INC. and STATE OF ALASKA
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN RIVERS, CLEAN WATER ACTION NETWORK, COOK INLETKEEPER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
