Cases 41 - 50 of 80
(PC) Flow-Sunkett et al v. Diaz et al
as 2:2019cv01009
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, Christian Pfeiffer, D Stebbins and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Sunkett and Brittney Flow-Sunkett
Not Classified By Court:
Special Appearance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) O'Connor v. CDCR et al
as 2:2019cv00658
Defendant:
J. Lizarraga, R. Borcken Borough, D. Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Loguidice v. California Correctional Health Care Services et al
as 1:2018cv01652
Defendant:
California Correctional Health Care Services and Rich
Plaintiff:
Thomas Loguidice
Other:
Special Appearance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Reif et al
as 2:2018cv01088
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Cherokee Brown
Defendant:
C. Reif, S. Overby, J. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meador v. Brown et al
as 2:2018cv00696
Plaintiff:
Gordon Dale Meador
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, Scott Kernan, 33 Wardens throughout CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Michael Fries
as 1:2017mc00064
Defendant:
Special Appearance
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Van Buren v. Parriott, et al.
as 1:2017cv00893
Plaintiff:
Irvin Van Buren
Defendant:
B L Parriott, T. Higgins and Special Appearance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guevara v. Smith, et al.
as 2:2017cv01820
Plaintiff:
Abiud Valencia Guevara
Defendant:
Robert Smith, Lilibeth Balo, Bennett Feinberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummings v. Peterson et al
as 2:2017cv01174
Plaintiff:
David T. Cummings
Defendant:
Carla Peterson, T. Oloyede, M. Felder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Sierra v. Director for the Dept of Corr, et al
as 17-16055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH A. SIERRA
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, JENNIFER BERETTO, A. ADAMS, Chief Medical Executive and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
