Cases 1 - 7 of 7
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv02235
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
United Spinal Association, Inc. and NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION, INC. v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv02236
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
State of New York v. United States Department of Ho
as 19-3591
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, in his official capacity as Acting Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
City of New York, State of New York, State of Vermont and others
Petitioner:
Citizens' Committee for Children of New York, American Public Health Association, Little Lobbyists and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
US, et al v. Lenke, et al
as 09-1728
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES and JOHN DOE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACQUELINE KAY POTEET
Defendant / Appellee:
REGIS W. HAID, MD, GERALD E. RODTS, JR., MD, MATTHEW F. GORNET, MD and others
Defendant:
BRADLEY T. ESTES, MD, CHRISTIAN PUTTLITZ, MD, LAWRENCE G. LENKE, MD and others
Appellant:
BOBBIE JEAN VADEN, MD
US, et al v. Lenke, et al
as 09-1728
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES and JOHN DOE
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACQUELINE KAY POTEET
Defendant - Appellee:
REGIS W. HAID, MD, GERALD E. RODTS, JR., MD, MATTHEW F. GORNET, MD and others
Defendant:
BRADLEY T. ESTES, MD, CHRISTIAN PUTTLITZ, MD, LAWRENCE G. LENKE, MD and others
Appellant:
BOBBIE JEAN VADEN, MD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
