Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00266
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00264
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
In re: Long-distance Telephone Servic
as 12-5380
In Re:
In re: Long-distance Telephone Service Federal Excise Tax Refund Litigation-MDL 1798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Oscar Gurrola, Virginia Sloan, Gary M. Sable and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Anthony Belloni
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, acting by and through the Internal Revenue Service, Verizon Communications Inc., AT&T, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01830
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01831
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rodrick DeRock v. Sprint-Nextel, et al
as 12-35849
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODRICK GORDON DEROCK
Defendant - Appellee:
SPRINT-NEXTEL, BOISE CITY, ADA COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
