Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Perkinson v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00461
Plaintiff:
Terry Perkinson
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lightfoot v. Saul
as 5:2021cv00051
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Ann Williams Lightfoot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lightfoot v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Ann Williams Lightfoot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ward v. Saul
as 7:2019cv00193
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Angela Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Ward v. Saul
as 5:2019cv00432
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Angela Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Morales v. Saul
as 5:2019cv00364
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Weller Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Martin III v. Saul
as 5:2019cv00354
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Morris Martin III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Braswell v. Saul
as 5:2019cv00336
Plaintiff:
Robin Braswell
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Simmons v. Saul
as 5:2019cv00334
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tallon v. Saul
as 7:2019cv00120
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Sean Christopher Tallon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
