Cases 1 - 10 of 250
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Webster v. Troup et al
as 2:2024cv01989
Plaintiff:
Stacey Webster
Defendant:
Davonna Troup and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
LUMBERMANS MERCHANDISING CORPORATION v. STACEY HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2024cv01111
Counter Defendant:
LUMBERMANS MERCHANDISING CORPORATION
Counter Claimant:
STACEY HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Klein v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01715
Plaintiff:
Stacey Klein
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Boldrini v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing et al
as 3:2023cv01615
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Defendant:
Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing as New Rez LLC aka New Penn Financial LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Services, Michael Niccolini, Lisa M. Gelb and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SERRANO-BEY v. MUVHA et al
as 2:2023cv03147
Plaintiff:
STACEY SERRANO-BEY and STACY SERRANO-BEY
Defendant:
(LATTANZIO?) MUVHA, KELBLE, FURGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Propst v. Williamsport, PA et al
as 4:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
Stacey Propst, Sr., Erika Propst, Jah'sin Propst and others
Defendant:
Williamsport, Pa, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
