Cases 1 - 10 of 12
COX v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2017cv00226
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COX
Defendant:
GWEN HORTH, STANLEY KNIGHT, VIRGIL R. MADDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MERRITT v. WIEMER ET AL
as 1:2016cv02927
Defendant:
LOTOYA CHERRY, SERGEANT HOSKING, STANLEY KNIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
OMAR MERRITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritt v. Wiemer et al
as 3:2016cv00728
Plaintiff:
Omar Merritt
Defendant:
Officer A Wiemer, Putnamville Correctional Facility, Bruce Lemmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UPSHAW v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2016cv00130
Defendant:
C. W. BASS, C. W. BYRERS, CRABB and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY UPSHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MAYFIELD v. MCCOY et al
as 2:2015cv00409
Defendant:
STANLEY KNIGHT, LOWE, MCCOY and others
Plaintiff:
CAMERON MAYFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NELSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2015cv00215
Defendant:
ROB HOSKINS, STANLEY KNIGHT, PAUL SNYDER and others
Plaintiff:
DEONTE' NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2015cv00983
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, RUSSEL ARCHER, BRITNER and others
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
AKEEM D. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. KNIGHT
as 2:2012cv00018
Defendant:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DUTCHER et al v. BUSS et al
as 2:2010cv00178
Defendant:
RON ALLEN, EDWIN BUSS, STANLEY KNIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R. DUTCHER and WILLIAM R. MORELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWELL v. BUGHER et al
as 2:2009cv00308
Plaintiff:
ANDRE' VANCE POWELL
Defendant:
ROBERT BUGHER, B. WEST, LAWANDA APPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
