Cases 91 - 100 of 118
SMITH v. KNIGHT
as 2:2012cv00311
Defendant:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Plaintiff:
MARK A. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FARRELL v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2012cv00285
Plaintiff:
CHAD FARRELL
Defendant:
KEITH, STANLEY KNIGHT and PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUDY v. LEMONS et al
as 2:2012cv00117
Defendant:
DR. STEPHEN HALL, STANLEY KNIGHT, BRUCE LEMONS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAMONT LUDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISBY-ISRAEL v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2012cv00116
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, JACK HENDRIX and others
Plaintiff:
AARON ISBY-ISRAEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUDY v. LEMONS et al
as 2:2012cv00083
Defendant:
DR. STEPHEN HALL, STANLEY KNIGHT, BRUCE LEMONS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAMONT LUDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. CARLISLE et al
as 2:2012cv00074
Defendant:
SHEILA A. CARLISLE, Mr. HARSTOCK, STANLEY KNIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
BRUCE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISBY-ISRAEL v. LEMMONS
as 1:2011cv01681
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, BEVERLY GILMORE, JACK HENDRIX and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY HUSPON, AARON ISBY-ISRAEL and TONY MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2011cv00174
Defendant:
RONDLE ANDERSON, B. HELMING and STANLEY KNIGHT
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PENDER et al v. PECKHAM et al
as 1:2011cv00511
Defendant:
ED BUSS, STANLEY KNIGHT, STEVE MCCAULEY and others
Plaintiff:
SARAH JO PENDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2009cv00174
Plaintiff:
DANA WOODS
Defendant:
STANLEY KNIGHT, TOM APPLEGATE, KELLY CARROLL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
