Cases 111 - 120 of 381
UPSHAW v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2016cv00130
Defendant:
C. W. BASS, C. W. BYRERS, CRABB and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY UPSHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JORDAN v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv00634
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JORDAN
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv00431
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
ROBERT G. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURKES v. KNIGHT
as 1:2015cv02048
Petitioner:
JIMMIE BURKES
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MAYFIELD v. MCCOY et al
as 2:2015cv00409
Defendant:
STANLEY KNIGHT, LOWE, MCCOY and others
Plaintiff:
CAMERON MAYFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLWELL v. KNIGHT
as 1:2015cv01694
Petitioner:
SHAWN D. COLWELL
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SINN v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2015cv01394
Defendant:
JOHN BRUSH, HARTZEL, J. HELDERMANN, II and others
Plaintiff:
DYLAN SINN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NELSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2015cv00215
Defendant:
ROB HOSKINS, STANLEY KNIGHT, PAUL SNYDER and others
Plaintiff:
DEONTE' NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2015cv00983
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, RUSSEL ARCHER, BRITNER and others
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
AKEEM D. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JEFFERS v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2015cv00153
Respondent:
KATHY ALVEY, STANLEY KNIGHT and BRIAN SMITH
Petitioner:
DERON JEFFERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
