Cases 11 - 20 of 250
STARR v. KNIGHT
as 1:2018cv00358
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
ANTHONY STARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Byron Brown v. Stanley Knight
as 17-2401
Petitioner - Appellant:
BYRON LAMAR BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Joshua Black v. Stanley Knight
as 17-2172
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSHUA BLACK
Respondent - Appellee:
STANLEY KNIGHT
SANDIFAR v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv01581
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
TROY A. SANDIFAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NELSON v. LYTTLE et al
as 1:2017cv01553
Respondent:
MR. L. GLENN, MR. STANLEY KNIGHT, MR. J. LYTTLE and others
Petitioner:
TERRELL NELSON
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VAUGHN v. BUGHER et al
as 1:2017cv01533
Respondent:
ROBERT BUGHER, GAGNON, STANLEY KNIGHT and others
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
BOBBY VAUGHN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRISCOE v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv00495
Petitioner:
JAMES D. BRISCOE
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRISCOE v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv00496
Petitioner:
JAMES D. BRISCOE
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
QUARLES v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv00470
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
DAMON QUARLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
QUARLES v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv00397
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
DAMON QUARLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
