Cases 111 - 120 of 361
SINN v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2015cv01394
Defendant:
JOHN BRUSH, HARTZEL, J. HELDERMANN, II and others
Plaintiff:
DYLAN SINN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NELSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2015cv00215
Defendant:
ROB HOSKINS, STANLEY KNIGHT, PAUL SNYDER and others
Plaintiff:
DEONTE' NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2015cv00983
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, RUSSEL ARCHER, BRITNER and others
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
AKEEM D. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JEFFERS v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2015cv00153
Respondent:
KATHY ALVEY, STANLEY KNIGHT and BRIAN SMITH
Petitioner:
DERON JEFFERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VAN DALSEN v. KNIGHT
as 2:2015cv00142
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
JAMES R. VAN DALSEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KINNINGHAM et al v. KNIGHT
as 2:2015cv00144
Defendant:
PENNY ALEE, JASON ENGLISH, ELESHA HILDAGO and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER JAMES ANGLEMYER and SHAWN WAYNE KINNINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIKE v. KNIGHT
as 2:2015cv00134
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
RANDALL PIKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GABHART v. KNIGHT
as 2:2015cv00127
Petitioner:
KURT GABHART
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. KNIGHT
as 2:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
DEWAYNE HILL
Defendant:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PLUMLEY v. KNIGHT
as 2:2015cv00118
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
RODNEY PLUMLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
