Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Erchul et al v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2016cv01718
Plaintiff:
Bettye Erchul and Jeffrey Louis Erchul
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Girma et al v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv04269
Plaintiff:
Matthew Girma , Melaku Woldeselassie and Seble Brizo
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation , Kivaun Helena Parraway and John Doe No. 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STARBUCKS CORPORATION v. BLOOD
as 7:2015cv00206
Plaintiff:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Defendant:
STEVEN BLOOD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Daniel Bitton v. Burger King, et al
as 15-13305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL BITTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BURGER KING, STARBUCKS CORPORATION, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Heinen v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2015cv00285
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Claudia Heinen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2012cv81052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PREMERA BLUE CROSS et al v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION et al
as 7:2012cv00074
Plaintiff:
PREMERA BLUE CROSS and STARBUCKS CORPORATION AND GROUP HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, DAVID HORHAN and HORHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
