Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Tokio Marine Specialty Insurance Company v. Starchem LLC
as 7:2025cv13900
Plaintiff:
Tokio Marine Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Starchem LLC
Counter-Claimant:
Starchem LLC
Counter-Defendant:
Tokio Marine Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Woodruff-Roebuck Water District v. AFL Telecommunications, LLC et al
as 2:2025cv11043
Plaintiff:
Woodruff-Roebuck Water District
Defendant:
AFL Telecommunications, LLC, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Arkema, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 a1 Federal Officer Removal
Woodruff-Roebuck Water District v. AFL Telecommunications LLC et al
as 2:2024cv04618
Defendant:
Waste Management of South Carolina Inc, AFL Telecommunications LLC, Roebuck Disposal LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Woodruff-Roebuck Water District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
STARCHEM LLC v. STARCHEM USA LLC
as 5:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
STARCHEM LLC
Defendant:
STARCHEM USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Jesus Rodriguez, et al v. Branch Banking & Trust Company, et al
as 21-11763
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee:
STARCHEM LLC, BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY and GUILLERMO GAMBOA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIANA ALVAREZ COLOMBO, ALIXON LOURDES COLOMBO DE ALVAREZ, ACCD, C.A. and others
Rodriguez et al v. Truist Bank formerly known as Branch Banking and Trust Company et al
as 1:2019cv25191
Plaintiff:
Alvarez & Parilli Despacho De Abogados, Mariana Alvarez Colombo, Jesus Alonso Alvarez Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Guillermo Gamboa, Truist Bank formerly known as Branch Banking and Trust Company, Starchem LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BEAZER EAST, INC. v. APOGENT TRANSITION CORP. et al
as 2:2014cv07925
Plaintiff:
BEAZER EAST, INC.
Defendant:
APOGENT TRANSITION CORP., APOGENT TECHNOLOGIES INC., LANXESS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
