Cases 1 - 10 of 1,852
Jones v. State of Maryland
as 1:2024cv02139
Petitioner:
Devin Lurrell Jones
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv02123
Plaintiff:
Joshua Colonna Jones
Defendant:
Frederick Circuit Court, State of Maryland and Frederick County Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Holland et al
as 1:2024cv02094
Defendant:
Adekoya, YesCare, et al./ YesCare Corp, et al, Schuster and others
Plaintiff:
Taiese D Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Chadwick v. The State Of Maryland
as 1:2024cv01985
Plaintiff:
Steve C. Chadwick
Defendant:
The State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy Mazyck v. Ronald Weber
as 24-6646
Respondent:
ANTHONY G. BROWN, The Attorney General of the State of Maryland and RONALD S. WEBER
Petitioner:
TROY MAZYCK
Randolph McDowell v. State of Maryland
as 24-6624
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH MCDOWELL
Respondent:
STATE OF MARYLAND, BALTIMORE CITY CIRCUIT COURT and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Berrios v. State of Maryland
as 1:2024cv01755
Petitioner:
Osbaldo Lemus Berrios
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01677
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davon Tate v. Christopher Smith
as 24-6535
Petitioner:
DAVON TATE
Respondent:
WARDEN CHRISTOPHER S. SMITH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Williams v. Stephen et al
as 8:2024cv01601
Plaintiff:
Milton Williams
Defendant:
Bryson Stephen, Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC, Monise A. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
