Cases filed in California
Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Regents of University of California et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv05211
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, Elaine Duke, Former Federal Immigration and Homeland Security Officials and others
Plaintiff: Regents of University of California, Janet Napolitano and UC Regents
Petitioner: City of Seattle, U.S. Conference of Mayors, City of West Hollywood and others
Amicus Curiae: Services, Immigrant Rights, and Education Network, West Contra Costa Unified School District, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
People of the State of California, et al v. Perry, et al
as 4:2017cv03406
Plaintiff: People of the State of California , State of New York , State of Connecticut and others
Defendant: James R. Perry , United States Department Of Energy and Air-Conditioning, Heating, & Refigeration Institute
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
United States of America et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv05389
Defendant: Astellas Pharma, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Impax Laboratories, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, John Radice, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America et al v. DJO Global Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv07152
Defendant: Biomet, Inc., DJO Finance LLC, DJO Global Inc. and others
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, Russ Milko, Doris Modglin and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02521
Plaintiff: United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Local 17 Hospitality Benefit Fund and others
Defendant: Teikoku Pharma USA, Teikoku Seiyaku Co, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Not Classified By Court: All Parties, Express Scripts, Inc., Caremark, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 4:2012mc80286
Plaintiff: United States of America , State of Alabama , State of Alaska and others
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation , Bank of America, N.A. , Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
The State of California et al v. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05229
Plaintiff: The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05230
Plaintiff: The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o , The State of Arizona by its Attorney GeneralTom Horne , The State of Arkansas by its Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and others
Defendant: Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 3:2012cv05231
Plaintiff: The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: Hitachi, Ltd. and Hitachi America, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01605
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?