Cases 71 - 80 of 620
Richard Moise v. State of Maryland
as 21-6879
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY HOGAN, Governor and STATE OF MARYLAND
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD D. MOISE
Kent Bell v. State of Maryland
as 21-6842
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND and U. S. DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENT BELL
Chris Brusznicki v. Prince George's County
as 21-1621
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN J. MCGIBBON, Acting Director Collector of Taxes, PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY and BRIAN E. FROSH, Attorney General for the State of Maryland
Plaintiff:
PARADISE POINT, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THORNTON MELLON, LLC, GEOFFREY POLK and CHRIS BRUSZNICKI
State of Maryland v. Nickens
as 1:2021cv01192
Defendant:
James D. Nickens, Jr.
Plaintiff:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anthony Smalls v. Jeffrey Nines
as 21-6601
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFFREY NINES, Warden and THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY MAURICE SMALLS
Santos v. The State of Maryland Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv00954
Defendant:
Charles County Sheriffs and The State of Maryland Inc.
Plaintiff:
Erick Anthony Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cleveland Hughes v. State of Maryland
as 21-6544
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLEVELAND HUGHES
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND
Paul Hurst v. Walter West
as 21-6468
Petitioner / Appellant:
PAUL MARTIN HURST
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN E. FROSH, Attorney General of the State of Maryland and WARDEN WALTER WEST
Rahymeen Barber, Sr. v. Rickey Foxwell
as 21-6442
Respondent / Appellee:
RICKY FOXWELL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAHYMEEN JAMEL BARBER, SR.
State of New York, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 21-70684
Petitioner:
STATE OF MAINE, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF HAWAII and others
Respondent:
MICHAEL REGAN, Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
