Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Brown v. State of RI, et al
as 12-1403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY L. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF RI, LINCOLN CHAFEE, in his official and individual capacity as Governor of the state of Rhode Island, A.T. WALL, in his official and individual capacity as Director of ACI and others
Raymond v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2011cv00601
Plaintiff:
Earl Raymond
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island , Ashbel T. Wall, II , Peter Rossi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chase v. Chafee et al
as 1:2011cv00586
Plaintiff:
Parrish Chase
Defendant:
Lincoln Chafee, David Fathi, Alvin J. Bronstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeBlanc v. State of Rhode Island, et al
as 1:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
Peter LeBlanc
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, State of Rhode Island and George . Vose, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendoza v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2009cv00298
Petitioner:
Michael Mendoza
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ferrell v. Caprio, Jr., et al
as 09-1712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON E. FERRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK CAPRIO, JR., MAUREEN MCKENNA GOLDBERG, FRANCIS J. WILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
GILBERT ROCHA and MARSHA CARPENTER
Bibby v. Sparr et al
as 1:2008cv00333
Plaintiff:
Peter J Bibby
Defendant:
Glenn Sparr, Daniel Schrock and State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Toro v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2008cv00064
Plaintiff:
Edson Toro
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island and A.T. Wall
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wheelock et al v. State of Rhode Island, et al.
as 1:2006cv00366
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wilson
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Carcieri, Ashbel T. Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
