Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, et al v. Paiva
as 23-1919
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD LEE PAIVA
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS A. PALMIGIANO, WILLIAM J. O'BRIEN, JOHN F. PIERCE and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC DAY, WILLIAM THOMAS, DANIEL SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF RI
Interested Party:
KENNETH WILSON, CHRISTOPHER HADLEY, NORMAN WHEELER and others
Oliveira v. Wall, et al
as 16-2210
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES F. OLIVEIRA
Respondent - Appellee:
ASHBEL T. WALL and STATE OF RI
Oliveira v. Wall, et al
as 16-2166
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES F. OLIVEIRA
Respondent - Appellee:
ASHBEL T. WALL and STATE OF RI
Dantzler v. State of RI, et al
as 15-2472
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN DANTZLER
Defendant - Appellee:
A.T. WALL, ADULT CORRECTIONAL and STATE OF RI
Kholi v. Wall, et al
as 15-1315
Petitioner - Appellant:
KHALIL KHOLI
Respondent - Appellee:
A.T. WALL and STATE OF RI
Paiva v. State of RI et al
as 1:2014cv00211
Petitioner:
David Paiva
Defendant:
State of RI, John McBurney and A.T. Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randall v. Krollman et al
as 1:2013cv00717
Plaintiff:
Charles Randall
Defendant:
John C Krollman, AT Wall, Haiban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. State of RI, et al
as 13-2318
Petitioner - Appellant:
CRAIG PRICE
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF RI, PETER F. KILMARTIN, RI Attorney General and A.T. WALL
Murray v. State of RI
as 1:2012cv00433
Petitioner:
Vincent P. Murray
Respondent:
State of RI and Judith Savage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. State of RI, et al
as 12-1403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY L. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF RI, LINCOLN CHAFEE, in his official and individual capacity as Governor of the state of Rhode Island, A.T. WALL, in his official and individual capacity as Director of ACI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
