Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mason Capital Master Fund, L.P. v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02304
Defendant:
Stefano Pessina, Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. and George R. Fairweather
Plaintiff:
Mason Capital Master Fund, L.P.
Recovery Master, LLC v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01912
Defendant:
Stefano Pessina, Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. and George R. Fairweather
Plaintiff:
Recovery Master, LLC
Chabot et al v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02118
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., George R. Fairweather and Stefano Pessina
Plaintiff:
Corey M. Dayton, Douglas S. Chabot and Joel M. Kling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
GARRETT v. STEFANO et al
as 2:2015cv04345
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ALI GARRETT
Defendant:
STEFANO, FELTON, ATKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. STEFANO
as 2:2015cv00865
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
FRANK STEFANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv06593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HOLMAN v. WOOTEN et al
as 2:2011mc00078
Plaintiff:
ROSLYN HOLMAN
Defendant:
TERRY L. WOOTEN, THOMAS E. ROGERS, III, SHARI L. STEFANO and others
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
Type:
Other Statutes
CATUCCI et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64790
Plaintiff:
STEFANO CATUCCI and THERESA CATUCCI
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANICIOTO v. TENNIS et al
as 5:2008cv04347
Petitioner:
STEFANO VITO MANICIOTO
Respondent:
FRANKLIN L. TENNIS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
