Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Durr v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2022cv03193
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Department of Corrections and Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Durr v. Lamiline Inc.
as 1:2019cv05695
Defendant:
Lamiline Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Durr v. Varga et al
as 1:2017cv06632
Petitioner:
Stephen Durr
Respondent:
John Varga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Durr v. United States Department of the Army et al
as 3:2017cv50276
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Defendant:
United States Department of the Army , Board For Correction Of Military Records and Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
Durr v. United States et al
as 1:2017cv01650
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Defendant:
United States , Department of Veteran Affairs and Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Durr v. State of Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv03019
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Defendant:
State of Illinois Department of Corrections and Office of the Illinois Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durr v. County Of Cook et al
as 3:2017cv50015
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Defendant:
County Of Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durr v. United States Postal Service, ex rel et al
as 1:2016cv11028
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Ex rel , Chicago Bulk Mail Center, Great Lakes Region and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Durr v. United States, et al
as 1:2016cv11029
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Defendant:
United States, Department of Veterans Affairs, Regional Office and Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
