Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Durr v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2022cv03193
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Department of Corrections and Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephen Durr v. USA, et al
as 21-5296
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stephen Durr
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America and Department of the Army
DURR v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv00354
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DURR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durr v. Lamiline Inc.
as 1:2019cv05695
Defendant:
Lamiline Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Durr v. United States Department of the Army et al
as 3:2017cv50276
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Defendant:
United States Department of the Army , Board For Correction Of Military Records and Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
Durr v. State of Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv03019
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Defendant:
State of Illinois Department of Corrections and Office of the Illinois Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen Durr v. Secretary of the Department of, et al
as 15-2350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN DURR
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Durr v. Sec'y, Department Of The Army et al
as 1:2015cv04555
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Defendant:
Sec'y, Department Of The Army and Office Of The U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv04993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
