General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
(HC) Lattin v. Jones We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02916
Petitioner: Stephen James Lattin
Respondent: Gena Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephen Scipio v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 15-12439
Petitioner - Appellant: STEPHEN JAMES SCIPIO
Respondent - Appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Scott v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv00002
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Petitioner: Stephen James Scott
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scipio v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv00025
Petitioner: Stephen James Scipio
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LARREW v. DEAN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00347
Petitioner: STEPHEN JAMES LARREW
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LARREW v. DEAN
as 1:2012cv00687
Petitioner: STEPHEN JAMES LARREW
Respondent: KENNETH DEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LARREW v. MOONEYHAM We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv00691
Plaintiff: STEPHEN JAMES LARREW
Defendant: JAMES D. MOONEYHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Walker v. Sorensen
as 2:2011cv00900
Petitioner: Stephen James Walker
Respondent: Dennis Sorensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LARREW v. MOONEYHAM
as 1:2011cv01346
Plaintiff: STEPHEN JAMES LARREW
Defendant: JAMES D. MOONEYHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stephen Wong v. Mark Nooth We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-35574
Petitioner - Appellant: STEPHEN JAMES WONG
Respondent - Appellee: MARK NOOTH, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?