Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Hall, et al v. Parsons Kinghorn Harris, et al
as 20-4041
Not Yet Classified: KIMBERLY CERUTI and SUMMIT WIND POWER, LLC
Respondent: MATTHEW M. BOLEY, GEORGE B. HOFMANN, PARSONS KINGHORN HARRIS, a professional corporation and others
Defendant: STEPHEN K. MEYER, SSP, a Trust (Scott Rasmussen - Trustee), CLAY R. CHRISTIANSEN and others
3Rd Party Defendant: MELYSSA DAVIDSON, individuals, LISA R. PETERSON and VICTOR E. COPELAND
Plaintiff: ELIZABETH LOVERIDGE, TONY HALL and ELLIS-HALL CONSULTANTS, LLC
Debtor: In re: RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Hall, et al v. Parsons Kinghorn Harris, et al
as 20-4040
Plaintiff: ELLIS-HALL CONSULTANTS, LLC, TONY HALL and ELIZABETH LOVERIDGE
3Rd Party Defendant: PARSONS KINGHORN HARRIS, a professional corporation, MELYSSA DAVIDSON, individuals, MATTHEW M. BOLEY and others
Not Yet Classified: KIMBERLY CERUTI and SUMMIT WIND POWER, LLC
Defendant: STEPHEN K. MEYER, CLAY R. CHRISTIANSEN, BONNIE G. MEYER and others
Debtor: In re: RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SSKTR, et al v. Bank of New York Mellon, et al
as 20-35239
Defendant / Appellee: TODD WHITE, in both public and private capacities, JOHN G. ALDRIDGE, in both public and private capacities, TOM PURCELL, in both public and private capacities and others
Plaintiff: FREDDIE MAC, JULIE A. METCALF KINNEY, solely as Beneficiary under SSKTR Trust, FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SALISH SKAJET KWABACABS TRIBAL REPUBLIC and WILLIAM X. NIETZCHE, solely as Trustee for SSKTR Trust
In Re SUBPOENA SERVED ON STEPHEN K. BANNON et al v. BANNON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020mc00091
Petitioner: Strategic Vision US LLC
Interested Party: Stephen K Bannon
In Re: Subpoena Served On Stephen K. Bannon
In Re SUBPOENA SERVED ON STEPHEN K. BANNON et al v. BANNON
as 1:2019mc00209
Petitioner: STRATEGIC VISION US LLC
Respondent: STEPHEN K. BANNON
In Re: SUBPOENA SERVED ON STEPHEN K. BANNON
Stefan Wilson v. USDC-SAC
as 19-72994
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: STEFAN ANDRE WILSON, AKA Stefan A. Wilson, AKA Stephen K. Wilson, AKA Steven K. Wilson
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Not Classified By Court: In re: STEFAN ANDRE WILSON
Jordan O'Hara et al v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00571
Defendant: Stephen K. Bannon, Cambridge Analytica, LLC, DOES and others
Plaintiff: Brent Collins, Olivia Johnston and Jordan O'Hara
Burnett et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as NYS/1:15-cv-09903
Plaintiff: Thomas E. Burnett, Sr. , Beverly Burnett , Antoinette D. Ognibene and others
Defendant: The Islamic Republic of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Hoseini-Khamenei , Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and others
Petitioner: Anne Marie McCann , Lillian C. Tetreault , Michael J. Gibbons and others
Receiver: Philip Smith and Raffaella Crisci
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05344
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jacoby & Meyers, LLP et al v. The Presiding Justiceas of the We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2608
Plaintiff: Jacoby & Meyers USA, LLC, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated entities authorized to practice law in the State of New York
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jacoby & Meyers USA II, PLLC and Jacoby & Meyers Law Offices, LLP, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated entities authorized to practice Law in the State of New York
Defendant - Appellee: The Presiding Justices of The First, Second, Third and Fourth Departments, Appellate Division Of The Supreme Court Of The State Of New York, Eric T. Schneiderman, Diane Maxwell Kearse, in her official capacity as Chief Counsel for the Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh and Thirteenth Judicial Districts and others
Defendant: Peter Tom, Angela Mazzarelli, Richard T. Andrias and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?