Cases 1 - 10 of 28
McCutchen et al v. Miller et al
as 4:2023cv01207
Plaintiff:
Cynthia McCutchen, Jimmy McCutchen and Beverly Fair
Defendant:
Steve Miller and ARI Fleet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MOORE v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2023cv01900
Plaintiff:
LINDELL MOORE
Defendant:
KYLE RUSSELL, ROBERT MCFADDEN, STEVE MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PUMBA v. MILLER et al
as 5:2022cv02050
Plaintiff:
OSVALDO PUMBA
Defendant:
STEVE MILLER, DOUGLAS METTE, JOSHUA LEEDBETTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITE v. GONZALES et al
as 5:2022cv01226
Plaintiff:
WILLIE WHITE, JR
Defendant:
SGT. TATIYANNA GONZALES, JANINE DONATE, WARDEN KYLE RUSSEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILLINS v. KEITH et al
as 2:2021cv02591
Petitioner:
SHANI GILLINS
Respondent:
STEVE MILLER and JESSICA KEITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HARRIS v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2020cv03745
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., STEVE MILLER, DR. WILSON and others
Plaintiff:
LOGAN TYRELL HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARRIS v. SALTERS et al
as 5:2020cv02718
Defendant:
DOUGLAS MATTE, MICHAEL SALTERS, KYLE RUSSELL and others
Plaintiff:
KEAYMON D. GARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2020cv02705
Plaintiff:
TAIJON EDWARDS
Defendant:
KYLE RUSSEL, ALL PERSONNEL INVOLVED, STEVE MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLERBY v. LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2020cv02428
Defendant:
KYLE RUSSEL, STEVE MILLER and LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON
Plaintiff:
DAMION ELLERBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steve Miller, et al v. Coca Cola Bottling, et al
as 16-3821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE MILLER and ANDRES CASTANEDA
Defendant - Appellee:
COCA COLA BOTTLING, SCOTT CHADWICK and RUSS QUERINO
Defendant:
WALTER O'BRIEN and DAVID PIETKUN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
