Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-17119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv04377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
California Coalition for Famil, et al v. San Diego County Bar Associati, et al
as 14-56140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALIFORNIA COALITION FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN and COLBERN C. STUART, III
Defendant - Appellee:
SAN DIEGO COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION, SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM D. GORE and others
Lubisch v. Judicial Council of California et al
as 5:2014cv00060
Plaintiff:
Greg Lubisch
Defendant:
Judicial Council of California and Steven Jahr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Pierce, et al v. Tani Cantil-Sakauye, et al
as 13-17170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD PIERCE, KERRY HICKS, ANDREW KARRES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, California Chief Justice, Chair of Judicial Council and STEVEN JAHR, Administrative Director of the Administrative Office of the Courts
Pierce et al v. Cantil-Sakauye et al
as 4:2013cv01295
Plaintiff:
Ronald Pierce , Kerry Hicks , Andrew Karres and others
Defendant:
Cantil-Sakauye and Steven Jahr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel Dydzak v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 12-57106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, MARIA SHRIVER, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General and others
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER et al
as 2:2012cv08759
Defendant:
1ST CENTURY BANCSHARES, INC., 1ST CENTURY BANK, MICHAEL BRUCE ABELSON and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel David Dydzak
DYDZAK v. SCHWARZENEGGER et al
as 1:2012cv01534
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, MARIA SHRIVER, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
