Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Vernon King, Jr. v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 16-40058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON KING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, STEVEN N. RICH, GENE A. KROLL and others
Vernon King, Jr. v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 15-40960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON KING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, STEVEN N. RICH, GENE A. KROLL and others
Vernon King, Jr. v. Steven Rich, et al
as 13-40315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON KING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN N. RICH, also known as Rich N. Steven, BRENDA CHANEY, SHARON D. ALLEN and others
Vernon King, Jr. v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 11-41220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON KING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, STEVEN N RICH, GENE A KROLL and others
Vernon King, Jr. v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 10-41053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON KING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, STEVEN N RICH, GENE A KROLL and others
Summers v. Rich et al
as 1:2010cv00348
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leon Summers
Defendant:
Steven N Rich, Gene A Kroll, Gideon Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vernon King, Jr. v. Steven Rich, et al
as 10-40522
Petitioner - Appellant:
VERNON KING, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVEN N RICH, WILLIAM PITTMAN and BRAD LIVINGSTON, Director
King v. Rich et al
as 1:2010cv00188
Petitioner:
Vernon King, Jr
Respondent:
Steven N Rich, William J Pittman and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Gardner v. David Hudson, et al
as 10-40183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. GARDNER
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID HUDSON, Warden, N. BURGESS, Co5, STEVEN N RICH, Warden and others
White v. Rich et al
as 1:2010cv00094
Petitioner:
Willie Paul White
Respondent:
Steven N Rich, State of Texas, City of Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
