Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Owens v. Mental Health Corrections Institution - Mahanoy et al
as 4:2017cv01657
Plaintiff:
Steven Owens
Defendant:
Mental Health Corrections Institution - Mahanoy, T DelBalso, C Cronauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Murray et al
as 4:2013cv00680
Plaintiff:
Steven Owens
Defendant:
John Murray, Rodney Carberry, John Horner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWENS v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2013cv00328
Plaintiff:
STEVEN OWENS
Defendant:
BRIAN COLEMAN, SCOTT NICKELSON, HOSTIVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2011cv01048
Plaintiff:
Steven Owens
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Corrections, Jeffrey K. Ditty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DOC, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2011cv02744
Plaintiff:
STEVEN OWENS and MARQUIS MOSLEY
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DOC, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DOC SUPERINTENDENT, JOHN HOMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv02750
Plaintiff:
STEVEN OWENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DOC COMMISSIONER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2011cv02689
Plaintiff:
STEVEN OWENS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HORNER, JOHN PALAKOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2010cv04329
Plaintiff:
STEVEN OWENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, HOOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2010cv04034
Plaintiff:
STEVEN OWENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, BILIN CABREA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
