Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Booth et al v. DeVos et al
as 6:2020cv01433
Plaintiff:
HELPS, David Becker and Jennifer Booth
Defendant:
Steven T. Mnuchin, Andrew Saul and Betsy DeVos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Quast v. Maurer et al
as 3:2019cv00282
Defendant:
STM Leasing LLC, LJM Fremont LLC, Steven T Maurer and others
Plaintiff:
Randall R Quast, MQH, LLC and Randall R. Quast
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Miller v. Baldwin
as 3:1996cv00114
Respondent:
George Baldwin
Petitioner:
Gerald Wesley Miller
503) 326-5524 (fax:
Steven T. Wax
Unknown:
Christine Stebbins Dahl
503) 224-3203 (fax:
Harrison Latto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Coursey
as 2:2013cv01612
Petitioner:
Ernest H. Baker, III
503) 326-5524 (fax:
Steven T. Wax
Respondent:
Rick Coursey
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fulton v. Koskinen et al
as 6:2015cv01359
Defendant:
L. Andrist, Ester E. Crawl-Bey, L. Glass and others
Plaintiff:
George Lyle Fulton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Simington v. Premo
as 6:2014cv01252
Respondent:
Jeff Premo
Petitioner:
Carl Lee Simington
503) 326-5524 (fax:
Steven T. Wax
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
New v. Nooth
as 2:2014cv01202
Petitioner:
David Brian New
503) 326-5524 (fax:
Steven T. Wax
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bams v. Nooth
as 2:2014cv01109
Petitioner:
William Bams
503) 326-5524 (fax:
Steven T. Wax
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romero v. Nooth
as 2:2014cv00938
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Petitioner:
Juan Romero
503) 326-5524 (fax:
Steven T. Wax
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
