Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Stokes v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2023cv00206
Petitioner:
Maurice D Stokes
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stokes v. Dorn et al
as 2:2022cv01543
Plaintiff:
Lee J Stokes
Defendant:
Jacob Dorn and Waupun Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanderbilt v. Stokes et al
as 2:2022cv00722
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lewis Vanderbilt
Defendant:
April Stokes, K Lampman and Peterlik Wunderlich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanderbilt v. Stokes et al
as 2:2021cv01331
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lewis Vanderbilt
Defendant:
April Stokes and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes vs Waupun Correctional Institution
as 2:2020cv00509
Plaintiff:
Lee J Stokes
Defendant:
Waupun Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes, Lee v. Dorrin, Jacob et al
as 3:2020cv00260
Plaintiff:
Lee J Stokes
Defendant:
C.O. Jacob Dorrin and Waupun Correctional Institution
Not Classified By Court:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Babbitt et al v. General Motors Company LLC
as 2:2015cv00435
Defendant:
General Motors Company LLC
Plaintiff:
Ryan Babbitt , Carla Bush , Michael Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marten Transport, Ltd. et al v. Stokes Trucking, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00608
Plaintiff:
Marten Transport, LTD , Marten Transport Services, LTD and Marten Transport Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
Stokes Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706
Stokes v. Pugh
as 2:2013cv00739
Petitioner:
Terrence C Stokes
Respondent:
Jeffrey Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
