Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Stuart v. Simon Premium Outlet
as 3:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Cal Stuart
Defendant:
Simon Premium Outlet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rosenbaum v. Columbia Banking Systems Inc
as 1:2023cv13234
Plaintiff:
Stuart H Rosenbaum
Defendant:
Columbia Banking Systems Inc doing business as Umpqua Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Fiorillo v. NE Edge, LLC, et al
as 23-2014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS J. FIORILLO
Plaintiff:
OCEAN DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS LLC, GOTSPACE DATA PARTNERS LLC, GOT CAPITAL LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NE EDGE, LLC, OSY TECHNOLOGIES SARL, APPLE INC. and others
Sharma v. Cole
as 23-1971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VEENA SHARMA
Defendant / Appellee:
STUART N. COLE, Trustee of County Mortgage Trust
Allenby v. Albert et al
as 1:2023cv12708
Plaintiff:
Norman Allenby
Defendant:
Deborah A Albert, Peter A Allenby and Stuart V Allenby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Muller v. Chen et al
as 1:2023cv12662
Plaintiff:
STUART JAMES MULLER
Defendant:
JIUN-LIANG CHEN and ZHAOJIE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL CO. LIMITED
Fiorillo v. NE Edge, LLC, et al
as 23-1861
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS J. FIORILLO
Plaintiff:
OCEAN DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS LLC, GOTSPACE DATA PARTNERS LLC, GOT CAPITAL LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NE EDGE, LLC, OSY TECHNOLOGIES SARL, APPLE INC. and others
Sharma v. Cole
as 1:2023cv12135
Plaintiff:
Veena Sharma
Defendant:
Stuart Cole formerly doing business as Trustee of County Mortgage Trust and Stuart N. Cole
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
COBB et al v. STUART
as 2:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
LISA COBB and LITTLE DUCKLINGS DAYCARE INC
Defendant:
KAREN STUART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
