Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Godstone v. Pedro et al
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Merlin Godstone
Defendant:
David Pedro, Stuart Young, Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Nguyen v. Borello et al
as 2:2023cv01073
Plaintiff:
Ryan Nam Nguyen
Defendant:
Daryl Borello, Stuart Young, Ms. Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jama v. Ball et al
as 3:2023cv00556
Plaintiff:
Hamza Mohammed Jama
Defendant:
(FNU) Ball, Christopher Randall, Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Suh et al
as 3:2022cv01961
Plaintiff:
Clarence Eugene Jones and Descendant of Black Chattel Slaves
Defendant:
Samuel Suh, Chaplain Toth, Dennis Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Young et al
as 6:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
Dameion Douglas
Defendant:
Stuart Young, Daryl Borello, Chaplain Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaton v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Aaron Dale Eaton
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Ms. Colette Peters, Ms. Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Young et al
as 3:2021cv01896
Plaintiff:
George Lee Marshall, Jr.
Defendant:
Stuart Young, Roger Haefer, S. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hollinquest v. Young et al
as 6:2021cv00894
Plaintiff:
Dasay Hollinquest
Defendant:
Daryle Borello, Stuart Young and Nathaline Frener
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
