Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ivan Burley v. Sumner County 18th Judicial Drug Task Force, et al
as 23-5172
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IVAN ANTJUAN BURLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUMNER COUNTY 18TH JUDICIAL DRUG TASK FORCE, SUMNER COUNTY, TN, JASON ARNOLD, Officer and others
Gary Accord v. Anderson County, TN, et al
as 22-5206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY ACCORD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDERSON COUNTY, TN, BEDFORD COUNTY, TN, BENTON COUNTY, TN and others
Mary Harcrow v. Clyde Harcrow, et al
as 21-5943
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY BETH HARCROW
Defendant / Appellee:
CLYDE HARCROW, JOHN DOES, 1-99, MILLERSVILLE, TN and others
Andy Allman v. Sonny Weatherford
as 21-5714
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDY L. ALLMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
SONNY WEATHERFORD, Sheriff of Sumner County, TN
Burley v. Arnold et al
as 3:2021cv00326
Defendant:
Sumner County, TN, City of Portland, TN, Jason Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Burley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Gay v. Sumner County, TN, et al
as 20-5350
Respondent:
SUMNER COUNTY, TN
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER DANIEL GAY
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Harcrow v. Harcrow et al
as 3:2018cv00828
Defendant:
Millersville, TN, City of, John Does 1-99, Clyde Harcrow and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Beth Harcrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goforth v. Sumner County, TN et al
as 3:2013cv00417
Plaintiff:
Dustin Goforth
Defendant:
Sumner County, TN, Sonny Weatherford and Sonya Troutt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00703
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Morton v. Gay, et al.
as 3:2009cv00082
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Morton
Defendant:
Sumner County, TN, Dee Gay and James Hunter
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
