Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Curtis Temple v. Lawrence Roberts, et al
as 24-1217
Plaintiff:
Curtis Temple
Defendant:
Lawrence Roberts, Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs, Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Timothy Lawrence Lapointe, Northern Plains Regional Director, Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Lionel Weston, Branch of Realty, Pine Ridge Agency, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of Interior and others
Baker Ranches, Inc., et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 22-15846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BAKER RANCHES, INC., DAVID JOHN ELDRIDGE, RUTH ELDRIDGE, as Co-Trustees of the David John Eldridge and Ruth Eldridge Family Living Trust dated January 31, 2007 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, SHAWN BENGE, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the National Park Service and others
Baker Ranches, Inc., et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 22-15765
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BAKER RANCHES, INC., DAVID JOHN ELDRIDGE, RUTH ELDRIDGE, as Co-Trustees of the David John Eldridge and Ruth Eldridge Family Living Trust dated January 31, 2007 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, SHAWN BENGE, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the National Park Service and others
Northern New Mexicans v. United States, et al
as 16-2047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORTHERN NEW MEXICANS PROTECTING LAND WATER AND RIGHTS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SALLY JEWELL, Secretary, U.S. Department of Interior, KEVIN K. WASHBURN, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Turner et al v. National Park Service Director et al
as 2:2011cv00331
Plaintiff:
Harold M Turner , John F Turner and Donald M Turner
Defendant:
National Park Service Director, National Park Service Regional Director and Grand Teton National Park Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
Winnemucca Indian Colony et al v. United States of America Department of the Interior et al
as 3:2011cv00622
Intervenor Defendant:
Ms. Linda Ayer
Defendant:
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Superintendent of the Western Nevada Agency of the Bureau of Indian Affairs and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Wasson and Winnemucca Indian Colony
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Pine Bar Ranch LLC, et al v. Interior Board of Indian Appea, et al
as 11-35564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PINE BAR RANCH LLC and OWEN TORREY
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERIOR BOARD OF INDIAN APPEALS, Department of Interior, ACTING REGIONAL DIRECTOR, United States of America, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Rocky Mountain Regional Office and EDWARD LONE FIGHT, Superintendent, Bureau of Indian Affairs
Dowling v. Schumacher
as 10-353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sean Dowling
Defendant - Appellee:
Hans Schumacher and James Nance, Superintendent
Dunn-McCampbell Royalty Intere, et al v. National Park Service
as 09-40187
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DUNN-MCCAMPBELL ROYALTY INTEREST INCORPORATED A TEXAS CORP, DUNN-PADRE CORPORATION A TEXAS CORP and MCCAMPBELL MINERALS INCORPORATED A TEXAS CORP
Defendant - Appellant:
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, an Agency of the United States Department of Interior and JOSEPH ESCOTO, in His Official Capacity as Superintendent of the Padre Island National Seashore
Amicus Curiae:
JERRY PATTERSON, Commissioner of the Texas General Land Office and Chairman of the School Land Board
McFarland v. Kempthorne, et al
as 06-36106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN JAMES MCFARLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRK KEMPTHORNE, in his capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, SUZANNE LEWIS, in her capacity as Superintendent of Glacier National Park, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
