Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Shawn Burton v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 26-2384
Plaintiff:
SHAWN L. BURTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Joseph Jay v. District Attorney Allegheny County, et al
as 26-2328
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JAY
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI
Gerald Waters v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 25-3426
Plaintiff:
GERALD WATERS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Enos Hershberger v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 25-3351
Plaintiff:
ENOS HERSHBERGER
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY JEFFERSON COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Carl Bell v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 25-3197
Plaintiff:
CARL EDWARD BELL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY
Ian Brenner v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 25-3062
Plaintiff:
IAN BRENNER
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY YORK COUNTY
Marcus Johnson v. Superintendent Forest SCI
as 25-2615
Plaintiff:
MARCUS JOHNSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Calvin Norris v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 25-1898
Plaintiff:
CALVIN NORRIS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY MERCER COUNTY
Todd Tarselli v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 25-1812
Plaintiff:
TODD HYUNG-RAE TARSELLI
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Antron Talley v. District Attorney Allegheny County, et al
as 25-1263
Plaintiff:
ANTRON TALLEY
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
