Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SHAFFER v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS et al
as 1:2022cv00138
Petitioner:
TINA LOUISE SHAFFER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF VENANGO COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COLLAZO v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS PA
as 5:2021cv05368
Petitioner:
ELIZABETH COLLAZO
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS PA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCINTOSH v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS, PA et al
as 5:2018cv03083
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF _____________________, SUPERINTENDENT, SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS, PA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS COUNTY
Petitioner:
KAWANIA MCINTOSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOOVER v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS PA et al
as 5:2017cv02665
Petitioner:
LEVILAYSHA MAY HOOVER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS PA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joyce Knox v. Superintendent State Correctio, et al
as 12-4595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOYCE KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT MUNCY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS
Jessica Strohl v. Superintendent SCI Cambridge, et al
as 12-4431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSICA STOHL
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Jennifer Spearman v. Rhonda Winstead, et al
as 12-2657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JENNIFER SPEARMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RHONDA A. WINSTEAD, Superintendent, SCI Cambridge Springs, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PIKE COUNTY, District Attorney for the County of Pike and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
