Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03598
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 cn Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Mottola v. Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP et al
as 1:2024cv02744
Plaintiff:
Carol M. Mottola
Defendant:
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, Rosalia A. Fazzone, Fazzone Law, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Weissbrod Gurvey v. Hochul et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Amy R. Weissbrod Gurvey
Defendant:
Hon. Kathy Hochul, Hon. Letitia James, Hon. Joseph A. Zayas and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09605
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Williams v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2023cv08303
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams
Defendant:
Richard J Sullivan, Debra A Livingston, Robert A Katzmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swain v. Primark US Corp.
as 1:2023cv06368
Plaintiff:
Tyesha Swain
Defendant:
Primark US Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Williams v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2023cv00756
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams
Defendant:
Richard J Sullivan, Debra A Livingston, Robert A Katzmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Biggers et al v. Swain et al
as 1:2023cv05893
Plaintiff:
Trenesha Biggers, M.F. and Z.S.
Defendant:
Laura Taylor Swain and Travis Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fontil v. Swain
as 1:2023cv05528
Plaintiff:
Raychel Fontil
Defendant:
Judge Laura Taylor Swain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Prometheus Biosciences, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04264
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Prometheus Biosciences, Inc., Mark C. McKenna, Helen C. Adams and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
