Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Swann et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq03216
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Mary Swann and Quentin Swann
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gorbey v. Harris et al
as 2:2022cv02262
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
Scott . Harris, Clayton R Higgins, Jr, United States Supreme Court Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Swann v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06037
Plaintiff:
Kia L. Swann
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
PRL USA Holdings, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2020cv06671
Plaintiff:
PRL USA Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", WILLIAMPOLO Authorized Store, couldshirt.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Swann v. Saul
as 1:2020cv06577
Plaintiff:
Kia L. Swann
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shelter Insurance v. Swann et al
as 3:2020cv00717
Defendant:
Donald L Swann and Tina Marie Swann
Plaintiff:
Shelter Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Swann v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv51567
Plaintiff:
Richard Swann
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02310
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Tipton et al v. Bayer Schering Pharma AG et al
as 3:2011cv10381
Plaintiff:
Joanna Tipton , Whitney Baxter , Marci Garner and others
Defendant:
Bayer Schering Pharma AG and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
