Cases 1 - 10 of 34
WILLIAMS v. SYKES
as 4:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Finess Williams
Defendant:
Thomas Sykes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00588
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
TS Big Creek, LLC v. Sykes
as 2:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
TS Big Creek, LLC doing business as Waterstone at Big Creek
Defendant:
Kierra Sykes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McHugh et al v. Sykes et al
as 1:2022cv01685
Plaintiff:
Kyle McHugh and Larry Meek
Defendant:
Ollin Sykes, Scotty Sykes, Sykes & Company, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
NHT Dawson LLC v. Sykes
as 2:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
NHT Dawson LLC doing business as The Cottages at Dawson Ridge
Defendant:
Kierra Sykes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Grant et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Annie Lois Grant, Quentin T. Howell, Elroy Tolbert and others
Defendant:
Brad Raffensperger, Sara Tindall Ghazal, Anh Le and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301 Denial or abridgement of right to vote on account of race or color
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Sykes v. Clark Atlanta University
as 1:2019cv00039
Defendant:
Clark Atlanta University
Plaintiff:
Derrick Sykes
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
The Franklin Johnston Group v. Sykes
as 1:2018cv05610
Defendant:
Kamari Sykes
Plaintiff:
The Franklin Johnston Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
