Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Belcher et al v. Shively et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Brian Belcher and Janis P. Belcher
Defendant:
Harry M. Shively, Truck Source Express, Inc., Sagamore Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Harris v. Shively et al
as 1:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Megan L. Harris
Defendant:
Harry M. Shively, Truck Source Express, Inc. and Sagamore Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Buffington v. Leatherwood et al
as 1:2019cv03924
Defendant:
Stanley Leatherwood, Speight Mark, M & S Trucking and others
Plaintiff:
Javion Dorcell Buffington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clarke v. Reed et al
as 1:2019cv03132
Defendant:
Alexandria Reed, Piramid Trucking, Inc. and Sagamore Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Sashana Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sagamore Insurance Company v. SSAB Florida Company, LLC, et al
as 15-13663
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAGAMORE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
SSAB FLORIDA COMPANY, LLC, ILIANA MARTINEZ, ILAYALI GUZMAN and others
Sagamore Insurance Company v. SSAB Florida Company, et.al
as 9:2014cv80488
Plaintiff:
Sagamore Insurance Company
Defendant:
SSAB Florida Company, LLC , Iliana Martinez, Ilayali Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Shah v. Corporate Carriers, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00224
Plaintiff:
Jirga Shah
Defendant:
Corporate Carriers, Inc. and Sagamore Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Sagamore Insurance Company v. Hicks
as 2:2007cv01799
Plaintiff:
Sagamore Insurance Company and Sagamore Insurance Company
Defendant:
Donnie R Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
R.M. v. Hampton et al
as 2:2007cv00763
Plaintiff:
R.M.
Defendant:
Brent G. Hampton, Brent G. Hampton, Cannonball Express Transportation, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
