Cases 1 - 10 of 11
King v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv00041
Petitioner:
Sammie Davis King, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Georgia, Warren Co. Trial Court Hammond, District Attorney Dennis C. Sanders and others
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harper et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2019cv04196
Plaintiff:
Jessica Freire, Norman Allen Thompson, Kathy Euliano and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
King v. Easterlin
as 1:2019cv02558
Defendant:
Ben F. Easterlin
Plaintiff:
Sammie Davis King, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. CHESTANG et al
as 5:2018cv00253
Defendant:
OFFICER KENNTH MORGAN, WILLIAM DOUPE, APPEAL COUNSEL LUCY JACKSON BELL and others
Plaintiff:
SAMMIE DAVIS KING, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright et al v. Scales 925 Atlanta, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv02425
Plaintiff:
Chrysten Wright , Monique Simms , Kurel Scott and others
Defendant:
Scales 925 Atlanta, LLC, Scales 925 Atlanta Management, LLC, Charles Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Davis v. Boggs et al
as 5:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Sammy Davis
Defendant:
Michael Boggs, Melanie Brogden, Michael D. Devane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2013cv00235
Plaintiff:
SAMMIE DAVIS KING, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, MARK WAYNE CHESTANG, KENNY MORGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Chestang et al
as 1:2011cv00142
Plaintiff:
Sammie Davis King, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Chestang and Dennis Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Boggs
as 5:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Sammy Davis
Defendant:
Michael P. Boggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
