Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Biers v. Dentons US, et al
as 23-4150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL L. BIERS, an individual and Chief Tribal Judge of the Te-Moak Supreme Court
Defendant / Appellee:
JUAN AREVALO, an individual, LESLIE A. BERG-GROVE, an individual, DAVID D. CARRERA, an individual and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH DELAROSA, an individual, ADELA MORRISON, an individual, STEVEN D. OLSON, an individual and others
Biers v. Dentons US, et al
as 23-4147
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMUEL L. BIERS, an individual and Chief Tribal Judge of the Te-Moak Supreme Court
Defendant / Appellee:
BRYAN L. BOWKER, in his official and individual capacity and JOSEPH MCDADE, in his individual and official capacity
Defendant:
LESLIE A. BERG-GROVE, an individual, KEVIN CLOCK, an individual, PAUL CONABLE, an individual and others
Cross Claimant:
STEVEN J. MCDADE, an individual
Biers v. Dentons US et al
as 2:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
Samuel L. Biers
Defendant:
Dentons US a Utah Entity doing business as Dentons, Durham, Jones, Pinegar, Zions Bancorporation, Salal Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Choc Harper, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 21-71241
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CHOC HARPER, HARLEY REYNOLDS and SAMUEL L. BIERS
Petitioner:
CHOC HARPER
Respondent:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of the Department of the Interior, BRYAN BOWKER, in his official capacity as the Western Regional Director Bureau of Indian Affairs, THE COURT OF INDIAN OFFENSES FOR THE WESTERN REGION-ELKO and others
Biers v. Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board et al
as 2:2015cv01518
Plaintiff:
Samuel L Biers
Defendant:
Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board , Jane Rushford , Ruthann Kurose and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
